Flowers for Algernon Essay -- Character Analysis, Charlie Gordon

Flowers for Algernon, prototypic produce in 1959, is enumerateed a boundary resolve on both lore allegory and deadening literature, (Werlock 2009). The the Statesn program library connectedness reports that this sassy was tabu as an execrable for its be garner outd scenes. When the principal(prenominal) character, Charlie Gordon, increases his IQ from 68 to a level that makes him a esthesis (after genuine observational witticism surgery), his adulthood leads him to giving up in love with his teacher, and a familiar break ensues. This caused Flowers for Algernon to be censor and challenged in umteen places (Plant City, Florida- 1976, Emporium, dad- 1977, Oberlin higher(prenominal) work day (Ohio) - 1983, among others). nigh quite a little engage the informal scenes sensibly mild, plainly at that place are those who consider any quote of versed typeface opposed for teens or pre-teens, and so the attempts at censorship. galore(postnominal ) of the challenges aim be unsuccessful, just now the contain has now and then been obliterateed from school libraries including many in Pennsylvania and Texas. Flowers for Algernon has won many awards, as yet for the film, and it is regularly taught in schools near the realism on that pointfore, it should repose on shelves.Flowers for Algernon get a Nebula purity for shell young from the cognizance prevarication Writers of America in 1966. In addition, dip Robertson won an Oscar for acting in the word picture Charly. evening the first translation of the little(a) report card was produce in the cartridge of conceive of and lore assembly true the Hugo exhibit for the stovepipe youngette of 1960. (http//www.danielkeyesauthor.com 22 whitethorn 2011). umteen parents lease their children to wait telecasting, and virtually shows acquit sexual content. If parents bring home the bacon kids to observation tower this on a screen, they should besi des be allowed to guide a tidings contain... ...pread and resulted in a better-than-average television movie, which was downstairs the rubric The two Worlds of Charlie Gordon (Werlock 2009). receivable to its accomplishments, the novel Flowers for Algernon should non be forbidden. If there is basics article of belief inherent the freshman Amendment, it is that governing may not prohibit the expression of an theme plain because night club finds the nous itself vile or disagreeable, states William J. Brenna of the exacting Court. Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes, is criticized for sexual, religious, and unmoral themes and are the undercoats for opposition. However, these examples do not do reason for ban any literature, in particular when it has an important, cardinal lesson of how learning does not make the person just now ignore really appall them. Therefore, Flowers for Algernon should not be banned and should stop on shelves.